The Harbinger

Category: Opinion

  • Why Animal Farm Will Always Be Relevant to Society

    Why Animal Farm Will Always Be Relevant to Society

    I was stopped in an airport by a man who noticed I was holding George Orwell’s Animal Farm. He looked to be older, and immediately met me with a smile when pointing out “you’re reading Animal Farm! How is it so far?” I was only 20 or so pages in, so I replied by saying that I saw some parallels to major moments in human history, and that I thought it was a really intriguing read so far.

    In the story, a wise pig named Old Major sparked some new, intellectual thought amongst his fellow animals and drove a revolution against their oppressors. It reminded me a lot of the American Revolution, and how the founding fathers organized a revolt. Old Major was like Thomas Paine waking others up with his piece Common Sense.

    This airport man went on to say that he’s read it every five years throughout his life since studying literature in college. He recommended the same for me; that I should read it every five years and I’ll still find Orwell’s story a fitting metaphor for the human condition. That’s the magic of the allegory.

    With that piece of advice in mind, I finished the rest of the story within a few days. Every page was meaningful- symbolic of flawed leadership, flawed society, flawed systems. It was the natural lifespan of an increasingly fascist society, all caused by the mistake of the blind follower’s faith.

    To sum it up, Mr Jones was a farmer who always mistreated his animals: starved them, beat them, exploited them. All the oppressed and abused animals accepted this as how life is, until one day, wise elder pig Old Major gives an impassioned speech creating a rebellion. With comradery and motivation, Mr Jones was overthrown and the animals went on to rule the farm.

    All were exilherated, beyond elated to have earned their freedom. Immediately, they began organizing their new way of life. They would work whenever, eat whenever, and sleep whenever. This all fell apart, however, when the smart pig named Napoleon began spreading lies, misinformation, killing his dissenters, and choke holding the entire farm into submission through fear his of murderous hounds. Napoleon ordered impossible working hours, essentially turning his “comrades” into slaves through the disguise of patriotism and progress. Food rations, harsh work hours, and strict regulation of free speech were given.

    The pigs began rewriting the constitution, fitting it to their desires. They began living as tyrants, living the same comfortable and luxurious lifestyle that Mr Jones, their previous dictator, had enjoyed. Of course, the entire story is more specific and detailed than this summary, but thats the gist.

    Initially, I began comparing this story to the United States’ revolutionary times. Colonies who wished to be sovereign rebelled against their oppressive king who lived overseas- their king who enjoyed a luxurious lifestyle. Their king that would cast upon them unjust taxes and the intolerable acts, and even ration their food with scarce supplies and little to no actual benefits of being under his rule. However, instead of good and democratic founding fathers like those who attended the first Continental Congress, this story is like if America was immediately born as a fascist nation with Washington as our dictator.

    Animal Farm certainly stands as a metaphor for the American Revolution, but this story can be applied to plenty of other instances. India’s liberation from British governance and occupation, South Africa’s riddance of apartheid led by Nelson Mandela, the Russian Revolution during World War One. 

    Most interesting to me, though, is how Animal Farm applies to modern United States politics. The book has aged like fine wine, and airport man was absolutely right: the story is always applicable in some way. Reading every five years might actually be a great idea. 

    I saw the personality and scumminess of Trump in Napoleon. Trump is a man who indulges in pleasure, even at the cost of his own dignity. He’s a man who lies to his blind following, as the animals once were to Napoleon. A man who steers the mob’s hive-minded thoughts for his own convenience. Lets talk about what actual details parallel.

    Squeaker was the spokesman of Napoleon; a devout follower whose only goal in life was to kiss Napoleon’s ass. Napoleon went on to fill the government with other pigs similar to squeaker. Ben Shapiro is a squeaker with rock-solid close-minded beliefs that he rattles off faster than Eminem just to preach pro-Trump rhetoric that is almost always factually incorrect. Elon Musk is the kind of squeaker that sits behind a screen spam-tweeting cult-like beliefs and praise into his own echochamber. Ron Desantis is an out of touch squeaker who has fallen so far into Napoleon’s cult that he’s essentially twisted the state of Florida into a testing ground of outdated societal structures and bigoted beliefs. Similar to Squeaker saying the year of slave labor was good for the animals who endured, Ron Desantis declared that slave-owners of the confederation did African Americans a favor.

    The rest of the pigs that enjoy a luxurious life style thanks to Napoleon stand to represent Trump’s business partners: yes-man suckers that please him, and his family and friends. Gluttony, a symbol of greed, became commonplace amongst the pigs on the farm. The pigs got much, much bigger as they lived lavishly with constant feasts and no rations on food. The cows produced milk one night, and while no one else was looking, the pigs took them and drank it all. Similarly, last May, Trump accepted an Air Force One from Q’atar as a gift, outmaneuvering restrictions that limit presidents from personally benefitting through presidency.

    Snowball, Napoleon’s competitor for leadership, was chased down by Napoleon’s hounds and forced into hiding. For the remainder of Napoleon’s rule as pigtator, he blamed every single thing that goes wrong on the farm on the unseen, unheard Snowball. Today, Trump and his administration are blaming undocumented immigrants for the bulk of the United States’ problems. Issues like unemployment, the economy, supply chain shortages, and higher crime rates are all supposedly the undocumented immigrants fault. The unseen, unheard undocumented immigrants. What does Trump do? He ignores the facts; immigrants strenghten the economy and supply chain, and, statistically, they have the same crime rate as U.S. citizens do.

    Trump tramples on undocumented immigrants with foul language and unbased accusations, then targets them with legislature stripping them of rights. All this to cover up the real causes of our country’s problems: wealthy businessowners hiring at criminally low wages, the rich not paying tax, Trump’s own tariff policy hindering supply chains, and a godforsaken pandemic that got millions unemployed.

    All this to say that the parallels are absolutely existent. The pigs in Animal Farm represent fascist leadership. Their methods and governments reflect many of the past, such as Hitler’s scapegoating and supremacist regime, Stalin’s scare-tactic obsessed and dissent-crushing sole leadership style, Mussolini with the self-proclaimed title of “The Duce of Fascism,”

    Orwell wrote Animal Farm as a warning with, impressively, no bias in how the story is told. The details, actions, and motivations of all of the animals on the farm speak for themselves. Animal Farm will remain a timeless sociological piece used to assess our own governance, and undoubtedly, as airport man said I should, I’ll be reading this story once every five years.

  • Is the College Board Good for the Education System?

    Is the College Board Good for the Education System?

    Students who want to challenge themselves have one go-to answer- the college board, an organization that provides advanced-placement classes and standardized tests nationwide. Essentially, it’s the reason behind every junior’s sudden dip in charisma near the end of the year. For many high schoolers, the mere sight of an acorn has become their trigger.

    While the Board grants high schoolers opportunities to achieve more and further their own goals, it’s also been hailed by the victims of their notorious AP tests as a purely evil operation. Thus, the board serves as most teenagers’ punching bags as a much needed scapegoat of their frustrations. Regardless of how much hate teachers and students alike have for the organization, lets ask ourselves this: what is the college board, how does it operate, and is it truly wrong?

    What is the College Board?

    Let’s start by exploring what it is. The College Board claims to be a “not-for-profit” organization, meaning that rather than investing it’s profit into the public cause, it is generally reinvested into the organization itself to better its services and quality. So, essentially, for profit without a mega-rich CEO; which is still a stretch because he makes $2.5 million a year. Top board executives make upwards of $300k a year, and criminally, they have charged the average high-schooler an average of just about $400 to take their tests. Are these high fees and high salaries truly necessary?

    What makes the board money, and has kept them so powerful within America’s education system, is their standardized tests. Tests like the SAT and various AP exams are truly major factors in college admissions. To put it bluntly, these exams weed kids out. Not even through accurate, in-depth tests as you’d hope it to be; just exams designed to be taken in three hours or so by anxiety-ridden high schoolers.

    How is the College Board Constructed?

    The board offers its membership to educational institutions, and so Over 6,000 high schools, colleges, and universities are members, and thus receive resources for students and educators created by the board itself. Structurally, the organization is surprisingly complex. It is composed of three bodies: the Board of Trustees, three national assemblies, six regional assemblies, and a surprise fourth, Freddy Kreuger who has come to take his revenge on children in the form of standardized tests.

    Because it is the most integral of the three, lets discuss the Board of Trustees. This is the governing body of the College Board, elected by member schools and totaling thirty-one officials. The body is made up of national, regional, and assembly elected trustees, but most importantly, the lead trustees. The lead is comprised of four positions: the chair, vice chair, immediately preceding chair, and CEO of the College Board, which, lets be honest, having an “immediately preceding chair” is like having a backup vice president- why?

    What Makes the College Board so Controversial?

    The Board’s CEO, David Coleman, is where the College Board’s initiative shines most brightly. In his 2014 “Delivering Opportunity” speech, Coleman declared that the College Board was created because “American democracy was at risk- because priveledge, rather than merit, might rule our country.” And he’s absolutely right, the organization is a warrior of meritocracy.

    Despite what Coleman claims, privaledge is undoubtedly still centerfold in “ruling our country.” In a research paper by Opportunity Insights, it is stated “the high income admissions advantage at private colleges is driven by three factors: (1) preferences for children of alumni, (2) weight placed on non-academic credentials, which tend to be stronger for students applying from private high schools that have affluent student bodies, and (3) recruitment of athletes, who tend to come from higher-income families.” In short; privaledge, privaledge, and yeah, privaledge.

    Similarly, in 2016, CB competitor ACT.org released statistics on average ACT score by family income. For students with families making above $80,000 a year, their test scores were, on average, nearly point points above the average of that of a student who’s family makes less than $80,000. This could be from a wide variety of factors, such as population density, housing, access to resources, education quality.

    For over a century, the College Board has worked to make education efficient but competitive. In that same “Delivering Opportunity” speech Coleman gave, he made it abundantly clear that their intitiative was to lift those up who deserve opportunity.

    Meritocracy, on paper, is a completely acceptable and sensible way to construct society. Those with higher capabilities, higher intelligence, higher motive, and stronger ethic will thrive in society. Students who choose to push themselves, have a higher g.p.a, and participate more will get into higher ranking colleges. Opportunity is based on ability.

    What if, conversely, ability is based on opportunity? Across the U.S, quality and accessibility of education vary significantly. In an education system designed around metrics such as AP classes and SAT scores, isn’t it wrong that not even all schools offer the same? According to APCentral, 52% of Native American students attended high schools with 5 or more AP courses in 2023-24, in comparison to 93% of Asian students, 84% of Hispanic/Latino students, 77% of White students, and 76% of Black students.

    On top of varying accessibility based on ethnicity, financial factors hold many back as well. According Dana Goldstein from the New York Times, “Some 60 percent of A.P. exams taken by low-income students this year scored too low for college credit.” This statistic has remained the same for the entire 21st century. The College Board hasn’t done quite enough to bridge that gap, however. Only recently had they introduced a fee waiver, and in 2019 CEO Coleman even admitted “What the SAT is…[is] a valid measure of your achievement…But what it doesn’t measure alone is…what you’ve overcome — the situation that you achieved that in.” Should we base a student’s academic success so heavily on a few standardized tests that don’t account for these things?

    The College Board has inserted it’s pure meritocratic ideology into the American education system, and though the organization genuinely attempts to lift students up, their ideology has flaws. Disparity, unanimity, and efficiency serve to weaken their effect, and these are some key areas that should be improved upon.

    On the topic of ideology, the big C.B. has shown a lack of confidence in it’s own values. In 2023, while Florida Governor Ron Desantis was on a crusade to fictionalize the existence of slavery and discrimination towards African Americans, he targeted the College Board. The Board, which has pledged to uphold quality education and serve the nation to its fullest, immediately folded under Desantis’ pressure to remove key topics from its AP African American Studies curriculum. Disappointedly, ignorance and bigotry stood victorious over the board. The Florida Department of Education responded in a letter, saying “By no coincidence, we were grateful to see that the College Board’s framework removed 19 topics, many of which FDOE cited as conflicting with Florida law, including discriminatory and historically fictional topics,”

    The College Board has a vital grip on U.S. education, and at the moment, their methods of classifying students are far too broad. The “not-for-profit” organization’s handsomely-paid execs and millionaire CEO gouge just about every dollar they can out of schools, educators, and student’s for little to no reason, and their operating costs do not justify the business-like practices they exert. David Coleman preaches of “beautiful and effective” tests designed to accurately place students in percentiles, when in reality they absolutely disservice minority racial groups and lower-income households. To combat this, they could use just a portion of their $1.1 billion in revenue each YEAR to expand their offered classes, tests, and curriculum.

    What the College Board ends up perpetuating is a cycle completely contradictory to its original purpose to negate privaledge and promote merit. The privaledged are more likely to achieve that merit, and the underprivaledged, by design, are not. Equal opportunity is not yet a reality attained by the board, and to achieve equity, it is direly needed that the organization’s absolutely massive government of Trustees, National Assemblies, Regional Assemblies, and Freddy Kreuger and whatever the hell else finally design some worthwhile tests with much more depth and accuracy to them.

    While following an honorable cause, providing useful resources, and guiding colleges with helpful admissions stats and scores, the College Board needs to reassess its priorities, recognize it’s influence, and finally take a more proactive role in fostering an effective education system.

  • The Epidemic of Incompetence Within the U.S. Government

    The Epidemic of Incompetence Within the U.S. Government

    As DOGE relentlessly cuts federal  welfare, departmental, and staff spending, its supporters have cheered it on as an effective means to reduce spending. In reality, the so-called “department” has so far done next to nothing to save the U.S. money. Federal spending in Trump’s second term is over $200 billion more than it was at this point in Biden’s presidency- on track to top even Raegan’s catastrophic dent in the national debt. DOGE’s means are not justified for the ends. The means, things like cutting education budget, welfare programs, housing investment, labor reform. And the end; money simply redirected to much worse investments, more borrowing, and citizens left devastated. The Trump administration’s goal is not to save money as it’s perpetrators say it is, but to weaken the power of the nation’s people to dissent.

    This second term is laced with malice, and this paper will cover one of its biggest: the republican party’s epidemic of ignorance. Work as a public servant entails the pursuit of knowledge, intellectual thought, and selflessness. More and more often, however, representatives and senators alike are attending sessions to get, to put it simply, schooled. It’s like a four-year-old preschooler running up to their teacher and saying “grass is blue” and by the time their teacher says “no the fuck it is not, we’re holding you back,” time has already been wasted that could have been used to teach everyone else. 

    Take Kristi Noem for example, the Secretary of Homeland Security who incorrectly stated in a Congress session last week that Habeas Corpus was “the president’s right to remove anybody from the country,” as if we lived in fascism. Her definition is the exact opposite of what Habeas Corpus actually is-criminal justice. That precious and expensive time that Noem held the floor, with many paid congresspeople present, was spent solely on giving her a ninth grade civics lesson. Why waste time like this when it could be much better spent actually getting things done?

    For many voters, qualification is becoming increasingly irrelevant. The expectation of politicians to be well-educated that was once cherished and, essentially, required to even be on the ballot has dissipated. Like Georgia’s 2022 senate race between Walker and Warnock, an incredibly close election between a football star, who more than likely has CTE, and, something just as impressive, a decorated and well-respected reverend with a degree in theology. It was an unbelievably close race between the two. Somehow Walker, who is almost completely unfamiliar with politics, nearly won. This could mean one of two things; voters care more about their party winning than actual logic, or, somehow, Walker brainwashed half of Georgia using a mind control device he built, which, if true, is so impressive maybe it does qualify for him to be a Senate candidate.

    Besides the absence of qualification and lack of basic knowledge about U.S. government functions, most far-right politicians are just not even thinking for themselves. You couldn’t convince me that there is a THING going on in Marjorie Taylor Green’s mind during her town hall meeting last month.

    Green, along with many other trump-backers, has faced Trump’s “Big Beautiful Bill” with an absolutely terrifying approach.

    When considering a bill, a legislator should know and ponder three things: what the bills is about, it’s details, and the logistics. Regardless of party, affiliation, background, religion, or any other biasing factors, representatives of the people should always, always, read the bill being proposed. You could read a bill about allocating thirty million dollars to squirrels jet-skiing at the Mall of America and if you approve of it? That’s great! As long as we know you know about it. If you approved of it just by looking at the title “Jetskis for Squirrels Act?” Even better! I would too! If you voted yay without knowing shit about what is was or is? That would high-key be a disappointment.

    To everyones surprise, she absolutely did not do either of those things. On June 3rd, she wrote “full transparency, I did not know about this section on pages 278-279 of the OBBB that strips states of the right to make laws or regulate AI for 10 years.” In other words, she didn’t read shit. First, how does one just casually mention this? That’s like barreling past a stop sign, ramming into a family of five with your pickup truck, and then saying “full transparency, I didn’t realize there was a massive red fucking stop sign there. Nor did I recognize I was going sixty miles an hour in a neighborhood. My b.”

    Green has her experience of being a conspiracy theorist under her belt and this is the one thing she chooses not to devote time and energy into reading. With her three passed bills this year having been to rename a post office, rename another post office, and unwind energy conservation method in water heaters, it’s more than likely she just wanted something to feel contributive to.

    Green wasn’t the only one to blindly approve of this bill, however. Many other far-right politicians simply skimmed through it, and, surprisingly, it’s not even entirely their fault. The “Big Beautiful Bill” is still in the Senate, having passed the House. This act is over one-thousand pages long, covering an incredibly wide variety of topics mostly unseen by Republican representatives.

    In his recent town hall, Nebraska Senator Mike Flood was pressed about page 562 of the bill, titled “Restriction on Enforcement.” As if that didn’t sound sketchy enough, in it is a severe weakening of the judicial branch. Essentially, if passed, Federal Courts significantly limits the tools available to them to force compliance of those convicted. Court orders lose their threat to violators, opening the door to further undermining of the law from white house administration. Flood, who wasn’t aware of any of that, ultimately apologized and said “when I found out that provision was in the bill, I immediately reached out to my Senate counterparts and told them of my concern.”

    Our leaders need to be knowledgeable, informed, and careful. Green and Flood learned a lesson that day that serves as an unbelievably damaging embarassment to themselves; do your job.

    Without competent and careful representatives and senators, who’s going to hold the executive branch accountable? Trump is aware of his followers negligience, their blind support. Obviously, he is going to take advantage of that. The name “Restriction on Enforcement” itself is a red flag the size of the national debt. A piece written almost exclusively for Trump to dismiss him of his crimes.

    To support does not mean to blindly follow. Healthy checks and balances require the critical attitude of all governmental branches and individuals within them, harshly shaping out one another to make them better. With the ignorant support of representatives and senators who, to put it bluntly, do not have a single original or constructive thought, Trump wins. The executive branch propels itself into full control, and nobody wins.

    In local and state elections, vote for people who display knowledge. Vote for candidates who prove the ability to think for themselves, care for the matter at hand, and more than anything, put their country above their biases.

    “Knowledge is wealth, wisdom is treasure, understanding is riches, and ignorance is poverty” – Matshona Dhliwayo

  • Why is Journalism Important?

    Why is Journalism Important?

    Imagine you dont know anything. You don’t know anything about history, culture, politics, media, entertainment, the sciences, other countries, the weather, anything at all. That reality could very well be ours if not for the people who write, the people who inform.

    Besides serving as important informants, writers grow as people along with their audiences. From Mark Twain to Betty Friedan, Sophocles to Carl Bernstein, they’ve served their societies tremendously. Forms of journalism outside of writing have kept the public informed with insurmountable knowledge, with stars such as Walter Cronkite keeping America lively with his skill as a TV Anchor, George Carlin with his social commentary that wore a mask of humor, John Oliver with his full-blown investigations into topics overlooked by the majority. People like these keep society thinking.

    Without journalists, anchormen, and investigators, who would keep authority in check? Johnson backed out of the Vietnam war because of Cronkite’s expose, Mark Twain mocked politicians in such a way that kept his audience critical, and in the modern day, The Atlantic pries into the cracks of the Trump Administration to keep facts centerfold. People will always remain writing, and across the serious, humorous, and furious, the country can unify itself within agreement of their journalists- the uncorrupted, in-touch spokespeople.

    Journalism is a timeless practice, dating so far back that people would mail each other rocks with writing on them to communicate in mesopotamia. That need to communicate is forever bound within human nature, and at seemingly all times there are things to talk about. Anyone can write, anyone can introduce new ideas, and everyone needs to be heard.

    Those writers are a platform who must put the microphone in the hands of others, speak into the microphone for the sake of the greater good, and deny the microphone from those who mean harm.